When is a beer not a beer?
Back in my youth I worked briefly for the Jolly Roger brewery. At Christmas they brewed a beer to the strength of the new year. So in 1990 it was OG1090, or about 9 % by volume. To get it to that strength involved using Champagne yeast (our beer yeast didn’t survive that level of alcohol toxicity) and supplementing the malted barley with large quantities of brown sugar. I thought it tasted vile and after complaints from the local constabulary it was only served in halve pints and a drink drive warning was put on the hand pull. It went for the then outrageous price of £2 a half. I thought it probably pushed the definition of ‘beer’ to the limit, rather approaching a malted barley & hop wine.
So how did they manage this?
I’m no expert (I just drove the brewery van) but I’m surprised that you can brew a beer this strong. So if anyone knows about this stuff and would care to enlighten me, please comment.
So how did they manage this?
I’m no expert (I just drove the brewery van) but I’m surprised that you can brew a beer this strong. So if anyone knows about this stuff and would care to enlighten me, please comment.
1 Comments:
sounds like a scam to me. Over here most drinks are made from malt, which technically makes them a beer,
even hooch! it's illeagal to sell pre mixed drinks, so they make it with malt, which gives them a rather perculiar taste. Smirnoff ice, mikes hard lemonade, any bottle of bitch piss is made the same way.
Post a Comment
<< Home